SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Navixy

Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Navixy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 64 that differ from Navixy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Navixy has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Navixy” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at NavixyFound at Navixy, not found there
Badger Mapsbadgermapping.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Badger Maps 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Routalroutal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Routal 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Lytxlytx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lytx 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Routificroutific.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Routific 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
One Step GPSonestepgps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to One Step GPS 35/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
RideCorideco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RideCo 52/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Data processing agreement Compare
NextBillion.ainextbillion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to NextBillion.ai 48/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Tookanjungleworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tookan 48/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Netradynenetradyne.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netradyne 43/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Nautonauto.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nauto 30/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
TripShottripshot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TripShot 30/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Routewarerouteware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Routeware 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.