Transparency alternatives to Routal
Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Routal. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from Routal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Routal has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Routal” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Routal | Found at Routal, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NextBillion.ainextbillion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to NextBillion.ai | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Navixynavixy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navixy | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| RideCorideco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RideCo | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| FTS GPSftsgps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FTS GPS | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Lytxlytx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lytx | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Tookanjungleworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tookan | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Netradynenetradyne.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netradyne | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| One Step GPSonestepgps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to One Step GPS | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Nautonauto.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nauto | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Routificroutific.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Routific | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Avriosavrios.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avrios | 30/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Badger Mapsbadgermapping.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Badger Maps | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.