SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to FTS GPS

Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FTS GPS does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 65 that differ from FTS GPS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FTS GPS has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and FTS GPS does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and FTS GPS does notFTS GPS publishes, and they do not
RideCorideco.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history Compare
Routalroutal.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Lytxlytx.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
NextBillion.ainextbillion.ai 48/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Tookanjungleworks.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Badger Mapsbadgermapping.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Netradynenetradyne.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
One Step GPSonestepgps.com 35/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
TripShottripshot.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Routificroutific.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Avriosavrios.com 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Nautonauto.com 30/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.