Transparency alternatives to RideCo
Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that RideCo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 65 that differ from RideCo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
RideCo has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and RideCo does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and RideCo does not | RideCo publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NextBillion.ainextbillion.ai | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tookanjungleworks.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Badger Mapsbadgermapping.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Routalroutal.com | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Routificroutific.com | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| One Step GPSonestepgps.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| FTS GPSftsgps.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Nautonauto.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Detrackdetrack.com | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Lytxlytx.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Netradynenetradyne.com | 43/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Navixynavixy.com | 39/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.