Alternatives to Fathom
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fathom does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from Fathom on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fathom has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Fathom does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Fathom does not | Fathom publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lushalusha.com | 74/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.com | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Mixmaxmixmax.com | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Scratchpadscratchpad.com | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Gonggong.io | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Outreachoutreach.io | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Apolloapollo.io | 57/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Salesloftsalesloft.com | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Clariclari.com | 48/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Avomaavoma.com | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Overloopoverloop.com | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Allegoallego.com | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.