Transparency alternatives to Mixmax
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mixmax. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 55 that differ from Mixmax on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Mixmax has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Mixmax” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Mixmax | Found at Mixmax, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lushalusha.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lusha | 74/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearbit | 65/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Showpadshowpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Showpad | 65/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ZoomInfozoominfo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ZoomInfo | 73/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Apolloapollo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Apollo | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fathomfathom.videoSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| PhantomBusterphantombuster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PhantomBuster | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Yeswareyesware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yesware | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Mindticklemindtickle.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mindtickle | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Hunterhunter.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hunter | 70/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Scratchpadscratchpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scratchpad | 61/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Instantlyinstantly.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Instantly | 57/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.