Transparency alternatives to Lusha
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lusha. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 55 that differ from Lusha on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Lusha has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Lusha” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Lusha | Found at Lusha, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixmaxmixmax.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mixmax | 74/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearbit | 65/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Snov.iosnov.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Snov.io | 62/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Clariclari.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clari | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| ZoomInfozoominfo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ZoomInfo | 73/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Hunterhunter.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hunter | 70/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Showpadshowpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Showpad | 65/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fathomfathom.videoSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom | 57/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Instantlyinstantly.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Instantly | 57/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| PhantomBusterphantombuster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PhantomBuster | 57/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Yeswareyesware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yesware | 57/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Albacrossalbacross.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Albacross | 52/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.