SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to PTI Security Systems

Other Self storage management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PTI Security Systems does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 15 that differ from PTI Security Systems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PTI Security Systems has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and PTI Security Systems does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PTI Security Systems does notPTI Security Systems publishes, and they do not
Storastora.co 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
OpenTech Allianceopentechalliance.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
QuikStorquikstor.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Unit Tracunittrac.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Easy Storage Solutionsstorageunitsoftware.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Storablestorable.com 17/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Tenant Inctenantinc.com 17/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
6Storage6storage.com 13/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cubbycubbystorage.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
SiteLinksitelink.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
CallPotentialcallpotential.com 9/100 1 Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Storeganisestoreganise.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.