SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Seobility

Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Seobility. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Seobility on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Seobility has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Seobility” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SeobilityFound at Seobility, not found there
Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor 26/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Mangoolsmangools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangools 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
seoClarityseoclarity.netSee also Transparency alternatives to seoClarity 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Mozmoz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moz 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Floyifloyi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Floyi 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Frasefrase.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Frase 22/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Keytrendskeytrends.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Keytrends 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
SerpApiserpapi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SerpApi 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
BrightEdgebrightedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BrightEdge 17/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI 35/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.