Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking
Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Advanced Web Ranking. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Advanced Web Ranking on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Advanced Web Ranking has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Advanced Web Ranking” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Advanced Web Ranking | Found at Advanced Web Ranking, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| OnCrawloncrawl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OnCrawl | 23/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Mangoolsmangools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangools | 39/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DataForSEOdataforseo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataForSEO | 32/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| AccuRankeraccuranker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccuRanker | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dragon Metricsdragonmetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dragon Metrics | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sitecheckersitechecker.proSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitechecker | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Mozmoz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moz | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| Seobilityseobility.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Seobility | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Floyifloyi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Floyi | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.