Transparency alternatives to Moz
Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Moz. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from Moz on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Moz has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Moz” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Moz | Found at Moz, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Mangoolsmangools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangools | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| OnCrawloncrawl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OnCrawl | 23/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| SerpApiserpapi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SerpApi | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| seoClarityseoclarity.netSee also Transparency alternatives to seoClarity | 35/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| DataForSEOdataforseo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataForSEO | 32/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| AccuRankeraccuranker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccuRanker | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dragon Metricsdragonmetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dragon Metrics | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sitecheckersitechecker.proSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitechecker | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.