Transparency alternatives to Mangools
Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mangools. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Mangools on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Mangools has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Mangools” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Mangools | Found at Mangools, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| OnCrawloncrawl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OnCrawl | 23/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Mozmoz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moz | 26/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Seobilityseobility.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Seobility | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Keytrendskeytrends.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Keytrends | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SerpApiserpapi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SerpApi | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| BrightEdgebrightedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BrightEdge | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| seoClarityseoclarity.netSee also Transparency alternatives to seoClarity | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| DataForSEOdataforseo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataForSEO | 32/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.