Transparency alternatives to Bringg
Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Bringg. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 80 that differ from Bringg on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Bringg has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Bringg” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Bringg | Found at Bringg, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip | 83/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Locuslocus.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Locus | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud | 70/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| EasyPosteasypost.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EasyPost | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ShipStationshipstation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipStation | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Shippogoshippo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shippo | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Turvoturvo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Turvo | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Paccuratepaccurate.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Paccurate | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Cargosoncargoson.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cargoson | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Freightosfreightos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freightos | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.