Alternatives to Cynet
Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cynet does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Cynet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cynet has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Cynet does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Cynet does not | Cynet publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expelexpel.com | 61/100 | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Huntresshuntress.com | 57/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Pantherpanther.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Corelightcorelight.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Red Canaryredcanary.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Trend Microtrendmicro.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Filigranfiligran.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Gigamongigamon.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Blumirablumira.com | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Arctic Wolfarcticwolf.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Todyltodyl.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Stellar Cyberstellarcyber.ai | 13/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.