Transparency alternatives to Pitchero
Other Sports team management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pitchero. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Pitchero on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pitchero has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Pitchero” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Pitchero | Found at Pitchero, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SportsEnginesportsengine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SportsEngine | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Hudlhudl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hudl | 50/100 | 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Spondspond.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spond | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Kitman Labskitmanlabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kitman Labs | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Sportradarsportradar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sportradar | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| TeamSnapteamsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamSnap | 43/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TeamLinktteamlinkt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamLinkt | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Trackmantrackman.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trackman | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Kinexonkinexon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kinexon | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Clubforceclubforce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clubforce | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| LeagueAppsleagueapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LeagueApps | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Teamworksteamworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamworks | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.