SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Pitchero

Other Sports team management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pitchero does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from Pitchero on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pitchero has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Pitchero does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Pitchero does notPitchero publishes, and they do not
Spondspond.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
SportsEnginesportsengine.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hudlhudl.com 50/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Kitman Labskitmanlabs.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sportradarsportradar.com 35/100 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
TeamSnapteamsnap.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Trackmantrackman.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Genius Sportsgeniussports.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Kinexonkinexon.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Catapultcatapult.com 22/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
LeagueAppsleagueapps.com 22/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Teamworksteamworks.com 22/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.