Transparency alternatives to Trackman
Other Sports team management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Trackman. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Trackman on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Trackman has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Trackman” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Trackman | Found at Trackman, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SportsEnginesportsengine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SportsEngine | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Hudlhudl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hudl | 50/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Pitcheropitchero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitchero | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kitman Labskitmanlabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kitman Labs | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TeamSnapteamsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamSnap | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Spondspond.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spond | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Sportradarsportradar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sportradar | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sportsplussportsplus.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Sportsplus | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| TeamLinktteamlinkt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamLinkt | 35/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Clubforceclubforce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clubforce | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| LeagueAppsleagueapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LeagueApps | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SquadFusionsquadfusion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SquadFusion | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.