SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Trackman

Other Sports team management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Trackman does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from Trackman on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Trackman has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Trackman does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Trackman does notTrackman publishes, and they do not
SportsEnginesportsengine.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hudlhudl.com 50/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Kitman Labskitmanlabs.com 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Pitcheropitchero.com 35/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Sportradarsportradar.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Spondspond.com 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history nothing Compare
TeamSnapteamsnap.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
TeamLinktteamlinkt.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Sportsplussportsplus.app 17/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Playermakerplayermaker.com 30/100 1 Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Catapultcatapult.com 22/100 1 Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Clubforceclubforce.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.