Transparency alternatives to Spond
Other Sports team management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Spond. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Spond on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Spond has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Spond” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Spond | Found at Spond, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hudlhudl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hudl | 50/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Kitman Labskitmanlabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kitman Labs | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| SportsEnginesportsengine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SportsEngine | 52/100 | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TeamSnapteamsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamSnap | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pitcheropitchero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitchero | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TeamLinktteamlinkt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamLinkt | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Playermakerplayermaker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Playermaker | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| SquadFusionsquadfusion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SquadFusion | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Teamworksteamworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamworks | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Sportradarsportradar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sportradar | 30/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Trackmantrackman.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trackman | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| Kinexonkinexon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kinexon | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.