Transparency alternatives to TeamSnap
Other Sports team management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at TeamSnap. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from TeamSnap on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
TeamSnap has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at TeamSnap” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at TeamSnap | Found at TeamSnap, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hudlhudl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hudl | 50/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Kitman Labskitmanlabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kitman Labs | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| SportsEnginesportsengine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SportsEngine | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Pitcheropitchero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitchero | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Spondspond.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spond | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Sportradarsportradar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sportradar | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Trackmantrackman.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trackman | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| UDiscudisc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UDisc | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LeagueAppsleagueapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LeagueApps | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Teamworksteamworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamworks | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Catapultcatapult.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Catapult | 9/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Zone7zone7.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Zone7 | 4/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.