SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Hudl

Other Sports team management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Hudl. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from Hudl on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Hudl has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Hudl” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at HudlFound at Hudl, not found there
SportsEnginesportsengine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SportsEngine 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
TeamSnapteamsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamSnap 43/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
TeamLinktteamlinkt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamLinkt 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Playermakerplayermaker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Playermaker 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 Compare
SquadFusionsquadfusion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SquadFusion 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 Compare
Spondspond.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spond 39/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Pitcheropitchero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitchero 35/100 1 Public pricing 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Sportradarsportradar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sportradar 30/100 1 Data processing agreement 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Trackmantrackman.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trackman 30/100 1 Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Kinexonkinexon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kinexon 26/100 1 Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
UDiscudisc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UDisc 26/100 1 Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Clubforceclubforce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clubforce 22/100 1 Public pricing 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.