Alternatives to Tempworks
Other Staffing agency software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tempworks does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Tempworks on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Tempworks has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Tempworks does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Tempworks does not | Tempworks publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loxoloxo.co | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Firefishfirefishsoftware.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Crelatecrelate.com | 35/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Gemgem.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Recruiterflowrecruiterflow.com | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Beamerybeamery.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Recruit CRMrecruitcrm.io | 32/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Hireflowhireflow.ai | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Trufflstruffls.de | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Sourcewhalesourcewhale.com | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Compleetcompleet.com | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Haufe Umantisumantis.com | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.