Transparency alternatives to Formbricks
Other Surveys and forms vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Formbricks. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Formbricks on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Formbricks has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Formbricks” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Formbricks | Found at Formbricks, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jotformjotform.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jotform | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Qualtricsqualtrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualtrics | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Wufoowufoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wufoo | 50/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cognito Formscognitoforms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognito Forms | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Filloutfillout.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fillout | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Survicatesurvicate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Survicate | 43/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| LimeSurveylimesurvey.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to LimeSurvey | 30/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| SoSci Surveysoscisurvey.deSee also Transparency alternatives to SoSci Survey | 30/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Medalliamedallia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Medallia | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| NIPO Nfieldnipo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NIPO Nfield | 17/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| SurveySparrowsurveysparrow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SurveySparrow | 61/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Refinerrefiner.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Refiner | 57/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.