SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to SurveySparrow

Other Surveys and forms vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at SurveySparrow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 48 that differ from SurveySparrow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SurveySparrow has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at SurveySparrow” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SurveySparrowFound at SurveySparrow, not found there
Jotformjotform.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jotform 65/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Qualtricsqualtrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualtrics 30/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 Compare
SoSci Surveysoscisurvey.deSee also Transparency alternatives to SoSci Survey 30/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Formbricksformbricks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Formbricks 52/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Wufoowufoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wufoo 50/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Typeformtypeform.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Typeform 45/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cognito Formscognitoforms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognito Forms 43/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Filloutfillout.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fillout 43/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Survicatesurvicate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Survicate 43/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Formstackformstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Formstack 30/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
HappyOrNothappy-or-not.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HappyOrNot 30/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
LimeSurveylimesurvey.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to LimeSurvey 30/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.