SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Qualtrics

Other Surveys and forms vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Qualtrics. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 48 that differ from Qualtrics on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Qualtrics has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Qualtrics” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at QualtricsFound at Qualtrics, not found there
Formbricksformbricks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Formbricks 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
SurveySparrowsurveysparrow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SurveySparrow 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Refinerrefiner.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Refiner 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Jotformjotform.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jotform 65/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Typeformtypeform.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Typeform 45/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Wufoowufoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wufoo 50/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Cognito Formscognitoforms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognito Forms 43/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Filloutfillout.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fillout 43/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Survicatesurvicate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Survicate 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Forms.appforms.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Forms.app 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Netigatenetigate.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Netigate 35/100 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Checkboxcheckbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Checkbox 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.