SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Rainforest QA

Other Test automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Rainforest QA does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Rainforest QA on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Rainforest QA has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Rainforest QA does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Rainforest QA does notRainforest QA publishes, and they do not
PractiTestpractitest.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Cypresscypress.io 65/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Applitoolsapplitools.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
BrowserStackbrowserstack.com 63/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Endtestendtest.io 48/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
ACCELQaccelq.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Kobitonkobiton.com 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Allure TestOpsqameta.io 30/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Katalonkatalon.com 48/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Applauseapplause.com 39/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Status page with history Compare
Global App Testingglobalapptesting.com 39/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Xraygetxray.app 39/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.