Alternatives to Recorded Future
Other Threat intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Recorded Future does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Recorded Future on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Recorded Future has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Recorded Future does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Recorded Future does not | Recorded Future publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dataminrdataminr.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Feedly Threat Intelligencefeedly.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Intezerintezer.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cywarecyware.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Anomalianomali.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| IPinfoipinfo.io | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Pulsedivepulsedive.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GreyNoisegreynoise.io | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Censyscensys.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Intel 471intel471.com | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| AbuseIPDBabuseipdb.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cyblecyble.com | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.