SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to LingoHub

Other Translation and localization vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that LingoHub does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 17 that differ from LingoHub on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

LingoHub has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and LingoHub does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and LingoHub does notLingoHub publishes, and they do not
Lokaliselokalise.com 87/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
Wordbeewordbee.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Crowdincrowdin.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
Transifextransifex.com 83/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Locizelocize.com 65/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Gridlygridly.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
memoQmemoq.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Smartlingsmartling.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Bureau Worksbureauworks.com 74/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Tolgeetolgee.io 30/100 nothing we found there and not here 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Localazylocalazy.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
Text Unitedtextunited.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.