SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Smartcat

Other Translation and localization vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Smartcat. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from Smartcat on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Smartcat has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Smartcat” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SmartcatFound at Smartcat, not found there
Lokaliselokalise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lokalise 87/100 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Certifications named Compare
DeepLdeepl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeepL 48/100 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
LingoHublingohub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LingoHub 74/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
wxrkswxrks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to wxrks 70/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Locizelocize.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Locize 65/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Transifextransifex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Transifex 61/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Crowdincrowdin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crowdin 43/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Traduoratraduora.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Traduora 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Wordbeewordbee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wordbee 39/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Weglotweglot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weglot 39/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
ContentQuo Evaluate HTcontentquo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ContentQuo Evaluate HT 30/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Localazylocalazy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Localazy 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.