Transparency alternatives to Locize
Other Translation and localization vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Locize. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Locize on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Locize has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Locize” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Locize | Found at Locize, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lokaliselokalise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lokalise | 87/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| wxrkswxrks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to wxrks | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Transifextransifex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Transifex | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Crowdincrowdin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crowdin | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| LingoHublingohub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LingoHub | 74/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Smartcatsmartcat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartcat | 65/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Traduoratraduora.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Traduora | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Phrasephrase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Phrase | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Weglotweglot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weglot | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Gridlygridly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gridly | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| memoQmemoq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to memoQ | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| Smartlingsmartling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartling | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.