Transparency alternatives to ContentQuo Evaluate HT
Other Translation and localization vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ContentQuo Evaluate HT. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from ContentQuo Evaluate HT on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ContentQuo Evaluate HT has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at ContentQuo Evaluate HT” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at ContentQuo Evaluate HT | Found at ContentQuo Evaluate HT, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lokaliselokalise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lokalise | 87/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| wxrkswxrks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to wxrks | 83/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| LingoHublingohub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LingoHub | 74/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Locizelocize.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Locize | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Smartcatsmartcat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartcat | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Transifextransifex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Transifex | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Wordbeewordbee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wordbee | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Crowdincrowdin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crowdin | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Traduoratraduora.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Traduora | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| DeepLdeepl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeepL | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Weglotweglot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weglot | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Localizelocalizejs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Localize | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.