SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to api.video

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at api.video. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from api.video on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

api.video has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at api.video” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at api.videoFound at api.video, not found there
Muxmux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mux 52/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Vimeovimeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vimeo 43/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 Compare
WeVideowevideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeVideo 70/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Loomloom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loom 61/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Vidyardvidyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vidyard 57/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Dacastdacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dacast 43/100 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Auphonicauphonic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Auphonic 39/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Movingimagemovingimage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Movingimage 35/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 Compare
SproutVideosproutvideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SproutVideo 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Simplecastsimplecast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simplecast 78/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Transistortransistor.fmSee also Transparency alternatives to Transistor 57/100 1 Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Tellatella.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Tella 48/100 1 Data location stated 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.