SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to api.video

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that api.video does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from api.video on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

api.video has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and api.video does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and api.video does notapi.video publishes, and they do not
Loomloom.com 74/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Muxmux.com 52/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Vidyardvidyard.com 57/100 1 Certifications named 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Auphonicauphonic.com 52/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Cleanvoicecleanvoice.ai 48/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Descriptdescript.com 48/100 1 Certifications named 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Acastacast.com 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Dacastdacast.com 35/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Muvimuvi.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 Compare
Brightcovebrightcove.com 22/100 1 Certifications named 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 Compare
Gumletgumlet.com 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
JW Playerjwplayer.com 48/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.