SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to HackerOne

Other Vulnerability management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that HackerOne does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from HackerOne on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

HackerOne has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and HackerOne does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and HackerOne does notHackerOne publishes, and they do not
Invictiinvicti.com 83/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Snyksnyk.io 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Intruderintruder.io 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Wizwiz.io 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Semgrepsemgrep.dev 48/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
SonarSourcesonarsource.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Detectifydetectify.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
StackHawkstackhawk.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Holm Securityholmsecurity.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Mendmend.io 50/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Aqua Securityaquasec.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Nucleus Securitynucleussec.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.