SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to WebAIM

Other Web accessibility vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at WebAIM. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from WebAIM on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

WebAIM has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at WebAIM” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at WebAIMFound at WebAIM, not found there
accessiBeaccessibe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to accessiBe 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
UserWayuserway.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to UserWay 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
A11yWatcha11ywatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to A11yWatch 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Evincedevinced.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Evinced 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Fablemakeitfable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fable 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
AccessiWayaccessiway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccessiWay 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Eye-Ableeye-able.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Eye-Able 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Dequedeque.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deque 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Siteimprovesiteimprove.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Siteimprove 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Starkgetstark.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Stark 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Accessibility Insightsaccessibilityinsights.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Accessibility Insights 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Pope Techpope.techSee also Transparency alternatives to Pope Tech 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.