SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Framer

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Framer does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Framer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Framer has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Framer does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Framer does notFramer publishes, and they do not
Glideglideapps.com 80/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ghostghost.org 65/100 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hostingerhostinger.com 65/100 1 Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.com 65/100 1 Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
Adaloadalo.com 45/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dudaduda.co 30/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
one.comone.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Wixwix.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Webflowwebflow.com 26/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Softrsoftr.io 55/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Tildatilda.cc 42/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
IONOSionos.com 40/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.