SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Elementor Hosting

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Elementor Hosting does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Elementor Hosting on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Elementor Hosting has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Elementor Hosting does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Elementor Hosting does notElementor Hosting publishes, and they do not
Hostingerhostinger.com 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Glideglideapps.com 78/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ghostghost.org 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Framerframer.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Unbounceunbounce.com 78/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.com 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Umsoumso.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Tildatilda.cc 41/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Sitejetsitejet.io 39/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
WordPress.comwordpress.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Softrsoftr.io 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Jimdojimdo.com 22/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.