SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Elementor Hosting

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Elementor Hosting. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Elementor Hosting on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Elementor Hosting has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Elementor Hosting” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Elementor HostingFound at Elementor Hosting, not found there
Hostingerhostinger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hostinger 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Glideglideapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glide 78/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squarespace 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Ghostghost.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Ghost 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Framerframer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Framer 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Unbounceunbounce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unbounce 78/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Umsoumso.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Umso 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Tildatilda.ccSee also Transparency alternatives to Tilda 41/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Sitejetsitejet.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitejet 39/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Typedreamtypedream.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Typedream 35/100 1 Certifications named 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
WordPress.comwordpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WordPress.com 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Supersuper.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Super 30/100 1 Data processing agreement 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.