SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Squarespace

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Squarespace. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Squarespace on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Squarespace has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Squarespace” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SquarespaceFound at Squarespace, not found there
Glideglideapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glide 78/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Unbounceunbounce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unbounce 78/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hostingerhostinger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hostinger 65/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Ghostghost.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Ghost 57/100 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Framerframer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Framer 52/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Softrsoftr.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Softr 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 Compare
Umsoumso.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Umso 48/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Elementor Hostingelementor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elementor Hosting 43/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Tildatilda.ccSee also Transparency alternatives to Tilda 41/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Sitejetsitejet.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitejet 39/100 1 Data location stated 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Brizy Cloudbrizy.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Brizy Cloud 35/100 1 Data location stated 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
WordPress.comwordpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WordPress.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.