SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Hostinger

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Hostinger. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Hostinger on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Hostinger has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Hostinger” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at HostingerFound at Hostinger, not found there
Glideglideapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glide 78/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Unbounceunbounce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unbounce 78/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ghostghost.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Ghost 57/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Elementor Hostingelementor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elementor Hosting 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
saldiasaldia.chSee also Transparency alternatives to saldia 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squarespace 57/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Framerframer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Framer 52/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Umsoumso.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Umso 48/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Sitejetsitejet.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitejet 39/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Brizy Cloudbrizy.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Brizy Cloud 35/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
WordPress.comwordpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WordPress.com 35/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Dudaduda.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Duda 30/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.