SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Umso

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Umso. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Umso on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Umso has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Umso” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at UmsoFound at Umso, not found there
Glideglideapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glide 78/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Hostingerhostinger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hostinger 65/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Unbounceunbounce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unbounce 78/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squarespace 57/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Framerframer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Framer 52/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Elementor Hostingelementor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elementor Hosting 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Wixwix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wix 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Ghostghost.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Ghost 57/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Sitejetsitejet.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitejet 39/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
WordPress.comwordpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WordPress.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Dudaduda.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Duda 30/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
one.comone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to one.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.