SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Whistleblower Partners

Other Whistleblowing systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Whistleblower Partners. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from Whistleblower Partners on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Whistleblower Partners has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Whistleblower Partners” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Whistleblower PartnersFound at Whistleblower Partners, not found there
FaceUpfaceup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FaceUp 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Whistlelinkwhistlelink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whistlelink 35/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Whispliwhispli.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whispli 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
EQS Groupeqs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EQS Group 22/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Ethenagoethena.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ethena 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
NAVEXnavex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NAVEX 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Signalistsignalist.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Signalist 29/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Case IQcaseiq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Case IQ 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ethicoethico.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ethico 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Mitratechmitratech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mitratech 26/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Trustytrusty.reportSee also Transparency alternatives to Trusty 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ethicontrolethicontrol.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ethicontrol 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.