Transparency alternatives to Agendrix
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Agendrix. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from Agendrix on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Agendrix has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Agendrix” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Agendrix | Found at Agendrix, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimaikimai.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Kimai | 30/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeskTime | 48/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jibble | 48/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Findmyshift | 45/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 7shifts | 39/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beebole | 39/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Meckanomeckano.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meckano | 39/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| RescueTimerescuetime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RescueTime | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Sonagetsona.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sona | 35/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.