Transparency alternatives to Beebole
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Beebole. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from Beebole on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Beebole has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Beebole” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Beebole | Found at Beebole, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeskTime | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tempotempo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Tempo | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| RescueTimerescuetime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RescueTime | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ActivTrakactivtrak.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ActivTrak | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jibble | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TimeCamp | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.