Transparency alternatives to Deputy
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Deputy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from Deputy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Deputy has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Deputy” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Deputy | Found at Deputy, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Time Doctor | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Sonagetsona.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sona | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeskTime | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beebole | 39/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Meckanomeckano.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meckano | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Rotageekrotageek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rotageek | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Next View LMSnextviewsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Next View LMS | 26/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Snap Schedule 365snapschedule.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Snap Schedule 365 | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.