Transparency alternatives to 7shifts
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at 7shifts. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from 7shifts on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
7shifts has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at 7shifts” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at 7shifts | Found at 7shifts, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeskTime | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tempotempo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Tempo | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jibble | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TimeCamp | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Time Doctor | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Meckanomeckano.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meckano | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.