Alternatives to Kimai
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Kimai does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Kimai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kimai has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Kimai does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Kimai does not | Kimai publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deputydeputy.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Homebasejoinhomebase.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.com | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ActivTrakactivtrak.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Papershiftpapershift.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| EARLYtimeular.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.com | 45/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.io | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.