Transparency alternatives to actiTIME
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that actiTIME does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 77 that differ from actiTIME on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
actiTIME has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and actiTIME does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and actiTIME does not | actiTIME publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubstaffhubstaff.com | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Agendrixagendrix.com | 70/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.com | 48/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.com | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.com | 39/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Papershiftpapershift.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| RescueTimerescuetime.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Rotageekrotageek.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Sonagetsona.com | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Clockodoclockodo.com | 30/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Kimaikimai.org | 30/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Next View LMSnextviewsoftware.com | 26/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.