Transparency alternatives to actiTIME
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at actiTIME. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from actiTIME on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
actiTIME has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at actiTIME” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at actiTIME | Found at actiTIME, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jibble | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 7shifts | 39/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beebole | 39/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Papershiftpapershift.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Papershift | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| RescueTimerescuetime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RescueTime | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Rotageekrotageek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rotageek | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Sonagetsona.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sona | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Clockodoclockodo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clockodo | 30/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Kimaikimai.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Kimai | 30/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.