Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at RotaCloud. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from RotaCloud on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
RotaCloud has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at RotaCloud” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at RotaCloud | Found at RotaCloud, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeskTime | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jibble | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| RescueTimerescuetime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RescueTime | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Softworkssoftworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Softworks | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TimeCamp | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Findmyshift | 45/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tempotempo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Tempo | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.