Transparency alternatives to FacilityOS
Other Workplace and visitor management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at FacilityOS. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from FacilityOS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
FacilityOS has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at FacilityOS” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at FacilityOS | Found at FacilityOS, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OfficeRnDofficernd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OfficeRnD | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Teamgoteamgo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamgo | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sinesine.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Sine | 59/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Envoyenvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envoy | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Kadencekadence.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Kadence | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Clearoomsclearooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearooms | 57/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Robinrobinpowered.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Robin | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| EZBookezbook.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EZBook | 18/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Cloudbookingcloudbooking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudbooking | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Freespaceafreespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freespace | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Matrix Bookingmatrixbooking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Matrix Booking | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Planonplanonsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planon | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.