SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Teamgo

Other Workplace and visitor management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Teamgo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Teamgo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Teamgo has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Teamgo” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at TeamgoFound at Teamgo, not found there
OfficeRnDofficernd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OfficeRnD 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
FacilityOSfacilityos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FacilityOS 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Clearoomsclearooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearooms 57/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Sign In Solutionssigninsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In Solutions 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Freespaceafreespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freespace 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 Compare
Sinesine.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Sine 59/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Robinrobinpowered.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Robin 48/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Sign In Appsigninapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In App 39/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
desk.lydesk.lySee also Transparency alternatives to desk.ly 35/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Yoffixyoffix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yoffix 35/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Seattiseatti.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Seatti 30/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Baskingbasking.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Basking 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.