SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Planon

Other Workplace and visitor management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Planon. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Planon on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Planon has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Planon” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at PlanonFound at Planon, not found there
OfficeRnDofficernd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OfficeRnD 65/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Teamgoteamgo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamgo 65/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
FacilityOSfacilityos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FacilityOS 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sinesine.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Sine 59/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Clearoomsclearooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearooms 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Robinrobinpowered.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Robin 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Envoyenvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envoy 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sign In Appsigninapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In App 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sign In Solutionssigninsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In Solutions 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Kadencekadence.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Kadence 35/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
desk.lydesk.lySee also Transparency alternatives to desk.ly 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Joangetjoan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Joan 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.