SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to OfficeRnD

Other Workplace and visitor management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at OfficeRnD. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from OfficeRnD on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

OfficeRnD has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at OfficeRnD” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at OfficeRnDFound at OfficeRnD, not found there
Teamgoteamgo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamgo 65/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact Compare
FacilityOSfacilityos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FacilityOS 61/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Robinrobinpowered.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Robin 48/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Envoyenvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envoy 43/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
Sign In Appsigninapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In App 39/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Joangetjoan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Joan 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 Compare
YAROOMSyarooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YAROOMS 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 Compare
OfficeSpaceofficespacesoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OfficeSpace 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 Compare
Qminderqminder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qminder 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 Compare
Vizitorvizitorapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vizitor 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 Compare
Clearoomsclearooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearooms 57/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Sign In Solutionssigninsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In Solutions 39/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.