SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Manatal

Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Manatal does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Manatal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Manatal has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Manatal does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Manatal does notManatal publishes, and they do not
Jobvitejobvite.com 85/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
iCIMSicims.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Bullhornbullhorn.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Joinjoin.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
JazzHRjazzhr.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.com 50/100 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Homerunhomerun.co 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Leverlever.co 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Pinpointpinpointhq.com 26/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Workableworkable.com 65/100 1 Subprocessor list nothing Compare
Ashbyashbyhq.com 55/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Greenhousegreenhouse.io 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.